High-risk signals Guaranteed daily returns

UNICK Promises a Fixed 7% a Day; Nothing Behind It Can Be Checked

The promotion we archived offers a guaranteed 7% daily return, names no company, no registration and no jurisdiction, and leaves no way to verify who holds the money.

You meet this in a message or a post: 7% a day, fixed, no conditions. Someone you know says they already doubled their money and the withdrawal worked. The pitch is short, the number is large, and there is nothing in it that tells you who is holding your deposit.

The pitch, in its own words

The promotion we archived sells one thing: a fixed return of 7% per day. The words fixed return are used as the guarantee. There is no market, no strategy, no product and no counterparty described. The offer is the number.

No minimum deposit is stated. No payment method is stated. No deposit instructions are stated. The name appears as UNICK, and in some of the material as UNICK PRO. That is the whole of the offer we could find.

What we were able to check

We checked four things, and three of them came back empty.

• Operating entity. No company name, no registration number, no jurisdiction. Nothing in the material identifies who is legally behind the product.
• Regulatory standing. No regulator search is on record for this name. Either it claims no jurisdiction at all, or the jurisdiction it claims does not license products of this kind.
• Custody. Nothing states where client money is held or who can move it. Without a licensed custodian or a segregated account, a withdrawal is a promise, not a claim on an asset.
• Promoter structure. No affiliate, referral or paid-promotion structure was visible in the material we archived.

That last point is the only one that came back clear, and it is the weakest of the four. Paid distribution is easy to hide, this is a snapshot in time, and it says nothing about whether a withdrawal is ever honoured.

The arithmetic that breaks it

7% a day compounds. On a $1,000 deposit the promotion implies $70 of interest on day one and about $2,129 in the first month.

Compounded daily, 7% turns into a multiple of roughly 53,098,084,598 times the principal after one year. That is an annualised figure of about 5.31e+12%. The principal doubles in about 10.2 days. A $1,000 deposit would pass one million dollars in roughly 0.28 years, which is about 14 weeks.

At three years the multiple is on the order of 1.5e+32. For scale, that is more money than exists. Whatever the promotion is doing, it is not producing a fixed 7% per day from a real market. No regulated investment product can hold to a guaranteed per-day payout.

Why the numbers need new money

A fixed daily payout has to come from somewhere. If the operator is not earning 7% a day in a market, the only other source is later deposits. Early participants are paid with money put in after them. That is the structure the arithmetic implies, and it is the structure that fails when deposits slow down.

This is why the withdrawal test matters and why it is not proof. A small withdrawal that clears shows that money is moving today. It does not show where the money came from, whether it belongs to you, or whether the next withdrawal will clear. In a payout funded by new deposits, the first withdrawals are the cheapest thing the operator can buy.

The strength-of-evidence check

Here is what we could verify and what we could not.

Could verify: the promotion exists as described, the return figure is stated as 7% per day, the guarantee language is fixed return, and the material is on record as active on 2026-10-07, the earliest point at which the promotion is on record.

Could not verify: the operator. No company, no registration number, no jurisdiction, no regulator, no custodian, no payment channel, no minimum. There is no one named to hold legally accountable and no account named that would hold the money.

The gap is the finding. A product that promises a fixed daily return and names no one is not a product you can check. It is a promise from an unidentified party.

What would change our assessment

Three things would move this from unverifiable to checkable.

1. A named legal entity, with a registration number and a jurisdiction, that can be looked up independently.
2. A regulator in that jurisdiction that licenses products of this kind, and a record that can be found without going through the promotion itself.
3. A named custodian holding client money in a segregated account, with terms that say who can move it and under what conditions.

Until those exist, the reader cannot verify who has the money, what backs the 7%, or what happens on the day they ask for it back. That is the state of the evidence, and it is the state your money would be in.

What to do if you are already in

• Do not send money on the strength of a fixed daily return figure alone.
• Ask for the legal entity name, registration number and jurisdiction in writing, and look them up yourself.
• Check whether a regulator in that jurisdiction licenses products of this kind, using the regulator's own register, not a link from the promotion.
• Ask which licensed custodian holds client money and whether the account is segregated.
• If you have already deposited, test a small withdrawal early and keep every record of the request and the response.
• Keep screenshots of the ads, posts and messages, with dates.
• Report the promotion to the financial regulator in your country.
• Speak to a licensed financial adviser before committing any further money.

In plain terms, what the record shows

• Promises a fixed return of about 7% per day — no regulated investment product can hold to a guaranteed per-day payout.
• Uses guarantee language: “fixed return”.
• No company, registration number or jurisdiction is named, so there is no one to hold legally accountable.

Questions readers ask about this one

Is UNICK a scam?

We cannot state that as a legal finding. What we can say is that the promotion we archived advertises a fixed 7% per day, names no company, no registration number and no jurisdiction, and does not say who holds client money. On the evidence we could check, nothing in it can be reconciled with a regulated investment product.

Is a fixed 7% daily return realistic?

7% a day compounds to roughly 5.31 trillion percent a year and doubles the principal in about 10.2 days. No regulated investment product can hold to a guaranteed per-day payout of that size. The figure is the reason to stop, not the reason to join.

What happens if I try to withdraw?

We have no record of a withdrawal being honoured or refused. A small withdrawal that clears early does not settle the question: it shows money moved on that day, not where it came from or whether the next request will be paid.

Who is behind UNICK?

Nothing in the material we archived identifies the operator. There is no company name, no registration number, no jurisdiction and no regulator on record for this name. That absence is the central problem: there is no named party to hold accountable.

What the promised number actually compounds to

UNICK advertises roughly 7% per day. Compounded and left alone, that is:

Compounded, no fees, no tax, no slippage, and — crucially — assuming every withdrawal is actually paid. The last row is the interesting one: a fixed payout has to be funded every single month, and the money has to come either from a real position earning it or from whoever deposits next.

Check the same figure yourself with the daily return calculator, put it next to what is actually guaranteed with the guaranteed-return check, or ask where the payout comes from in the new-deposit calculator.

Strength-of-evidence check

This number measures how much can be checked, and a low score is the dangerous case: nobody outside the operation can verify who runs it, whether it is supervised, or where the money sits — and unverifiable is where the loss risk lives. Read a low score as a warning, not as a technicality. A high score buys you nothing either: a well-documented operation is still a proposition you have to check yourself before you send any money.

What the register holds on this name

Name as promoted

UNICK

Also seen as

UNICK PRO, UNICK PRO VOLTOU, UNICK

Guarantee wording used

“fixed return”

First logged

7 October 2026

Last re-checked

26 October 2026

Think this entry is wrong?

Entries are re-checked and corrections are published in the changelog rather than made quietly. If a project has shut down, changed hands or can produce something we could not find, tell us.