The pitch, in its own words
The promotional material we reviewed offers a fixed return of about 1% per day and uses the word “guarantee”. It does not describe a strategy, a market, a broker, or a custody arrangement. It does not name a minimum deposit. It does not name a payment method.
On a $1,000 deposit, the advertised payout is $10 a day, or about $304.17 a month. The material presents this as a rate that simply continues.
No website was listed in the material we archived. The names that appear alongside the pitch are DaxScalper, and two other labels, smoke-test-alias and LiveTrading. Nothing in the material explains how these names relate to one another or to any legal entity.
What we were able to check
We checked the name against the SEC public register. The search returned no matching entry. That is the full extent of what we could verify from outside.
We could not verify an operating company. No registration number, no jurisdiction, and no named director appear anywhere in the material. Nothing identifies who is legally behind the product.
We could not verify who holds the money. No custodian, no segregated account, and no licensed institution is named. Without a custodian, a withdrawal is a promise from an unidentified party, not a claim on an asset.
We could not verify a promoter or referral structure. No affiliate links, referral codes, or paid-promotion markers were visible in the snapshot we archived. That is a statement about one moment in time, not a clearance.
The arithmetic that breaks it
A fixed 1% per day compounds to 3,678.34% a year. That is 37.78 times the original deposit after twelve months. After three years, the same rate multiplies the deposit by 53,939.17.
At that rate, $1,000 becomes $1 million in about 1.9 years. The advertised doubling time is 69.7 days.
No regulated investment product holds a guaranteed per-day payout. Markets do not produce a fixed daily return, and no strategy converts a volatile asset into a constant daily credit. The number is not a forecast. It is a fixed promise, and a fixed promise of that size has to be paid from somewhere other than trading.
Why the numbers need new money
If a $1,000 deposit is owed $10 a day, the operator must find $10 a day from somewhere. Trading at 1% a day, every day, with no losing days, is not a documented outcome. The more likely source of the payout is the next depositor.
That structure has a known shape: early participants are paid from later deposits, the balance sheet grows, and the payout continues only while new money arrives. When deposits slow, withdrawals stop. The people who lose are the ones still holding a balance.
The material does not show a trading record, an audit, or a custody statement that would let a reader check whether any payout came from a market at all.
The strength-of-evidence check
What we have is a promotion, a rate, and a name. What we do not have is an entity, a jurisdiction, a registration number, a custodian, or a regulator entry. The absence of those items is the finding.
We searched one register, the SEC, and found no matching entry. That result does not authorise the product. Most products of this kind operate outside any regime that would list them, and a register search says nothing about whether a withdrawal is ever honoured.
We saw no referral structure in the snapshot we archived. Paid distribution is easy to hide, and a single snapshot cannot show how the promotion was spread or who was paid to spread it.
Nothing in the material identifies a person or company that could be held accountable if the payouts stop.
What would change our assessment
A named operating company with a registration number and a jurisdiction would give a reader something to check. A licensed custodian holding client money in a segregated account would change what a withdrawal means. A dated, audited trading record that reconciles the advertised payout to actual market results would address the arithmetic.
None of those items appear in the material we archived. Until they do, the reader cannot verify who holds the money, who is legally responsible, or whether any payout came from trading. That is the position to weigh before sending anything.
What to do if you are already in
- Do not send money to a product that promises a fixed daily return.
- Search the SEC public register for the exact name and any company name you are given.
- Ask for the legal entity name, registration number, and jurisdiction in writing.
- Ask who holds client money and whether the account is segregated.
- If you have already deposited, test a small withdrawal early and keep the record.
- Keep copies of every ad, message, payment receipt, and wallet address.
- Report the promotion to the SEC or your local financial regulator.
- Talk to a licensed financial adviser before committing any amount.
In plain terms, what the record shows
- Promises a fixed return of about 1% per day — no regulated investment product can hold to a guaranteed per-day payout.
- Uses guarantee language: “guarantee”.
- No company, registration number or jurisdiction is named, so there is no one to hold legally accountable.
Questions readers ask about this one
Is DaxScalper registered with the SEC?
A search of the SEC public register returned no matching entry under the name. Not being listed is not the same as being authorised, and it says nothing about whether a withdrawal is ever honoured.
Can any investment guarantee 1% per day?
No regulated investment product holds a guaranteed per-day payout. At 1% a day, $1,000 compounds to 37.78 times the deposit in a year and to $1 million in about 1.9 years.
Who owns DaxScalper?
The material we archived names no operating company, no registration number, and no jurisdiction. Nothing identifies who is legally behind the product.
What happens if I try to withdraw?
We could not verify any withdrawal. No custodian or segregated account is named, so a withdrawal is a promise from an unidentified party rather than a claim on an asset.
What the promised number actually compounds to
DaxScalper advertises roughly 1% per day.
Compounded and left alone, that is:
| Horizon | What the promise implies |
|---|
| One year | 3,678.34% — $100 becomes $3.8K |
| Three years | $100 becomes $5.4M |
| Balance doubles | every 69.7 days |
| $1,000 to $1,000,000 | about 1.9 years |
| Payout owed on $1,000 | $304.17 every month, forever |
Compounded, no fees, no tax, no slippage, and — crucially — assuming every withdrawal is actually
paid. The last row is the interesting one: a fixed payout has to be funded every single month, and the money has
to come either from a real position earning it or from whoever deposits next.
Check the same figure yourself with the
daily return calculator,
put it next to what is actually guaranteed with the
guaranteed-return check,
or ask where the payout comes from in the
new-deposit calculator.
| Starting from $1,000 | Reached after | Then pays out |
|---|
| $2.0K |
69.7 days |
$20.00 per day |
| $10.0K |
231.4 days |
$100.00 per day |
| $100.0K |
1.3 years |
$1.0K per day |
| $1.0M |
1.9 years |
$10.0K per day |
Strength-of-evidence check
36/ 100 checkable
Thin
Very little of what is claimed about the operator, supervision or custody can be checked by an outsider.
Registered operating entity
0/30
No operating company, registration number or jurisdiction is stated anywhere in the material we archived. Nothing identifies who is legally behind the product.
Regulatory standing
18/25
We searched the public registers in SEC and found no alert under this name. That is not a clearance either: not being listed is not the same as being authorised, most of these products operate outside any regime that would list them at all, and the search says nothing about whether a withdrawal is ever honoured.
Promoter & referral structure
18/25
No affiliate, referral or paid-promotion structure was visible in the material we archived. That is not a clearance: paid distribution is easy to hide, this is a snapshot in time, and it says nothing about whether a withdrawal is ever honoured.
Who holds the money
0/20
Nothing states where client money is held or who can move it. Without a licensed custodian or a segregated account, a withdrawal is a promise, not a claim on an asset.
This number measures how much can be checked, and a low score is the dangerous case: nobody
outside the operation can verify who runs it, whether it is supervised, or where the money sits — and unverifiable
is where the loss risk lives. Read a low score as a warning, not as a technicality. A high score buys you nothing
either: a well-documented operation is still a proposition you have to check yourself before you send any money.
What the register holds on this name
- Name as promoted
- DaxScalper
- Also seen as
- LiveTrading, DaxScalper, smoke-test-alias
- Guarantee wording used
- “guarantee”
- Regulator registers searched
- SEC — not_found
- First logged
- 7 October 2026
- Last re-checked
- 10 October 2026
Think this entry is wrong?
Entries are re-checked and corrections are published in the changelog rather than made quietly. If a project has
shut down, changed hands or can produce something we could not find, tell us.
Correct or appeal this entry
